|

|
IJE TRANSACTIONS A: Basics Vol. 26, No. 10 (October 2013) 1145-1154
|
Downloaded:
446 |
|
Viewed:
2497 |
|
|
EFFECT OF THE HEIGHT INCREASING ON STEEL BUILDINGS RETROFITTED BY BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACING SYSTEMS AND TTD DAMPER
|
|
|
J. Vaseghi Amiri, A. R. Mirza Goltabar and H. Shafiei Seifabadi
|
|
|
( Received:
March 03, 2013
– Accepted: April 18, 2013 )
|
|
|
Abstract
The
Behavior of conventional braced
frames, are not the same in tension and compression. This problem can be improved
by
prevention
of buckling under compressive loads, which is called
buckling restrained brace(BRB). In this field TTD metal
damper also have much attention due to simplicity
in construction and execution. This damper is recommended because of
accessing
to better performance than BRB brace and also having easier construction
technology and consequently cheaper
until possibility of making it is feasible
in countries without complex technologies. In
this research, three steel
structures with three, five and eight stories that
require to retrofitting, are retrofitted using buckling
restrained
brace and TTD metal damper separately, and are compared before and after the retrofitting using
nonlinear dynamic
analysis in Perform 3d software. Finally, the effects of this
systems in reduction of structure displacement, reduction
of energy dissipation
due to nonlinear behavior in main members of structure, and increasing of
performance level is
inspected. The observation of both of systems results also imply that with increasing
of the number of building stories,
expressed positive effect, is reduced. Which that, indicates more effect of this energy
dissapation systems in
short-order structures.
|
|
|
Keywords
Seismic Retrofitting, Buckling Restrained Brace, TTD Metal Damper, Conventional Braces, Energy Dissipation Systems,
Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis
|
|
|
چکیده
رفتار
قابهاي مهاربندي شده متداول در كشش و فشار یکسان نیست. این مشکل
را ميتوان
با جلوگيري از كمانش مهاربند تحت بارهاي فشاري،
بهبود بخشید. چنين مهاربندي، مهاربند مقید در برابر کمانش یا مهاربند کمانش ناپذیر(BRB) ناميده
ميشود. همچنین در این عرصه میراگر فلزی نوعTTD به دلیل سادگی
در ساخت واجرا از توجه زیادی برخوردارند.. این میراگرباهدف
دستیابی به عملکرد بهتر از مهاربند BRBوهمچنین داشتن تکنولوژی
ساخت ساده تر و در نتیجه ارزان تر، معرفی شده است تا امکان ساخت آن در کشورهای
فاقد تکنولوژی های پیچیده امکان پذیر باشد. در اين مقاله سه ساختمان فولادی سه ،پنج
و هشت طبقه که نیاز به بهسازی دارند را به صورت جداگانه با مهاربند کمانش ناپذیر
و میراگر TTD بهسازی کرده و
آنها را در دو حالت قبل و بعد از بهسازی و با استفاده از تحلیل دینامیکی غیر خطی
در نرم افزارPERFORM 3D مورد مقایسه قرار می دهیم. در نهایت
تاثیر این سیستم ها درکاهش تغییر مکان سازه، کاهش اتلاف انرژی ناشی از رفتار
غیرخطی در اعضای اصلی سازه و افزایش سطح عملکرد سازه مورد بررسی قرار می
گیرد. همچنین نتایج نشان می دهد که با افزایش تعداد طبقات ساختمان
تاثیرات مثبت بیان شده ،کاهش می یابد که این نشان دهنده ی تاثیر مناسب تر این
سیستم های اتلاف انرژی در سازه های کوتاه مرتبه می باشد.
|
|
References
1. Shafiei, S., H., and Mirzagoltabar, R., A,, Seismic characteristics investigation of
steel structures retrofitted by buckling restrained braces, in civil
engineering., Pardisan University: Iran. (2012)
2. Wakabayashi, M.,
Nakamura, T., Kashibara, A., Morizono, T. and Yokoyama, H., "Experimental
study of elasto-plastic properties of precast concrete wall panels with
built-in insulating braces", in Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual
Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan. Vol. 104121044, (1973), 12-20.
3. Choi, H. and
Kim, J., "Energy-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced frames
using hysteretic energy spectrum", Engineering Structures, Vol. 28, No. 2, (2006), 304-311.
4. Ariyaratana, C.
and Fahnestock, L. A., "Evaluation of buckling-restrained braced frame
seismic performance considering reserve strength", Engineering Structures, Vol. 33, No. 1, (2011), 77-89.
5. Terán-Gilmore,
A. and Ruiz-García, J., "Comparative seismic performance of steel frames
retrofitted with buckling-restrained braces through the application of
force-based and displacement-based approaches", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake
Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 3,
(2011), 478-490.
6. Sahoo, D. R. and
Chao, S.-H., "Performance-based plastic design method for
buckling-restrained braced frames", Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 9, (2010), 2950-2958.
7. Benavent-Climent,
A., "A brace-type seismic damper based on yielding the walls of hollow
structural sections", Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 4, (2010), 1113-1122.
8. Lin, S., MacRae,
G., Wu, A., Lin, P. and Tsai, K., "Development and implementation of
buckling restrained braces in Taiwan",
9. Xie, Q.,
"State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in asia", Journal
of Constructional Steel Research,
Vol. 61, No. 6, (2005), 727-748.
10. "Instruction
for seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings", , No. 360, (2006).
11. Agency,
F. E. M., "Prestandard and
commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings: Fema-356. 2000",
Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington.
12. "Researching
center of building and habitation, design code of buildings against iran’s
earthquake,2800 code, 1st ed", (1987).
13. "Sap
software, v 14.2, computers and structures, inc, (csi). Berkeley", (2000).
14. "Perform-3d
software, “ nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3d structures,
v.4.0.3, computers and structures, inc., (csi). Berkeley", (2007).
15. "Researching
center of building and habitation, design code of buildings against iran’s earthquake,2800
code, 3st ed.", (2005).
16. "Fema,
(federal emergency management agency) 450, “ nehrp recommended provision for
seismic regulation for new building and other structures”, washington,
d.C," (2004).
17. "Aisc,
(american institute of steel construction), “seismic provision for structural
steel building ”.Ansi/aisc 341-05", (2005).
18. Tsai,
K.-C., Chen, H.-W., Hong, C.-P. and Su, Y.-F., "Design of steel triangular
plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction", Earthquake
Spectra, Vol. 9, No. 3, (1993),
505-528.
19. Mirzagoltabar,
R., A., and Shamstabar, k., R., " Nonlinear analysis and performance
assessment for 3d structures using perform-3d software", 1st Noshirvani
University of Technology, Babol, Iran,
(2012).
20. pakniat,
S. and pakniat, E., "Required analysis in seismic retrofitting of
structures based on 2800 and 360 code of iran", 1st, Motafakeran
Pablications, (2011).
21. Uang,
C., M., and Nakashima, M., Steel buckling-restrained
braced frames. 2004: CRC Press LLC.
|
|
|
|
|