Abstract




 
   

IJE TRANSACTIONS A: Basics Vol. 26, No. 10 (October 2013) 1145-1154   

downloaded Downloaded: 446   viewed Viewed: 2497

  EFFECT OF THE HEIGHT INCREASING ON STEEL BUILDINGS RETROFITTED BY BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACING SYSTEMS AND TTD DAMPER
 
J. Vaseghi Amiri, A. R. Mirza Goltabar and H. Shafiei Seifabadi
 
( Received: March 03, 2013 – Accepted: April 18, 2013 )
 
 

Abstract    The Behavior of conventional braced frames, are not the same in tension and compression. This problem can be improved by prevention of buckling under compressive loads, which is called buckling restrained brace(BRB). In this field TTD metal damper also have much attention due to simplicity in construction and execution. This damper is recommended because of accessing to better performance than BRB brace and also having easier construction technology and consequently cheaper until possibility of making it is feasible in countries without complex technologies. In this research, three steel structures with three, five and eight stories that require to retrofitting, are retrofitted using buckling restrained brace and TTD metal damper separately, and are compared before and after the retrofitting using nonlinear dynamic analysis in Perform 3d software. Finally, the effects of this systems in reduction of structure displacement, reduction of energy dissipation due to nonlinear behavior in main members of structure, and increasing of performance level is inspected. The observation of both of systems results also imply that with increasing of the number of building stories, expressed positive effect, is reduced. Which that, indicates more effect of this energy dissapation systems in short-order structures.

 

Keywords    Seismic Retrofitting, Buckling Restrained Brace, TTD Metal Damper, Conventional Braces, Energy Dissipation Systems, Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis

 

چکیده    رفتار قاب‌هاي مهاربندي شده متداول در كشش و فشار یکسان نیست. این مشکل را مي‌توان با جلوگيري از كمانش مهاربند تحت بارهاي فشاري، بهبود بخشید. چنين مهاربندي، مهاربند مقید در برابر کمانش یا مهاربند کمانش ناپذیر(BRB) ناميده مي‌شود. همچنین در این عرصه میراگر فلزی نوعTTD به دلیل سادگی در ساخت واجرا از توجه زیادی برخوردارند.. این میراگرباهدف دستیابی به عملکرد بهتر از مهاربند BRBوهمچنین داشتن تکنولوژی ساخت ساده تر و در نتیجه ارزان تر، معرفی شده است تا امکان ساخت آن در کشورهای فاقد تکنولوژی های پیچیده امکان پذیر باشد. در اين مقاله سه ساختمان فولادی سه ،پنج و هشت طبقه که نیاز به بهسازی دارند را به صورت جداگانه با مهاربند کمانش ناپذیر و میراگر TTD بهسازی کرده و آنها را در دو حالت قبل و بعد از بهسازی و با استفاده از تحلیل دینامیکی غیر خطی در نرم افزارPERFORM 3D مورد مقایسه قرار می دهیم. در نهایت تاثیر این سیستم ها درکاهش تغییر مکان سازه، کاهش اتلاف انرژی ناشی از رفتار غیرخطی در اعضای اصلی سازه و افزایش سطح عملکرد سازه مورد بررسی قرار می گیرد. همچنین نتایج نشان می دهد که با افزایش تعداد طبقات ساختمان تاثیرات مثبت بیان شده ،کاهش می یابد که این نشان دهنده ی تاثیر مناسب تر این سیستم های اتلاف انرژی در سازه های کوتاه مرتبه می باشد.

References   

 

1.     Shafiei, S., H.,  and Mirzagoltabar, R., A,, Seismic characteristics investigation of steel structures retrofitted by buckling restrained braces, in civil engineering., Pardisan University: Iran. (2012)

2.     Wakabayashi, M., Nakamura, T., Kashibara, A., Morizono, T. and Yokoyama, H., "Experimental study of elasto-plastic properties of precast concrete wall panels with built-in insulating braces", in Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan. Vol. 104121044, (1973), 12-20.

3.     Choi, H. and Kim, J., "Energy-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced frames using hysteretic energy spectrum", Engineering Structures,  Vol. 28, No. 2, (2006), 304-311.

4.     Ariyaratana, C. and Fahnestock, L. A., "Evaluation of buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance considering reserve strength", Engineering Structures,  Vol. 33, No. 1, (2011), 77-89.

5.     Terán-Gilmore, A. and Ruiz-García, J., "Comparative seismic performance of steel frames retrofitted with buckling-restrained braces through the application of force-based and displacement-based approaches", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,  Vol. 31, No. 3, (2011), 478-490.

6.     Sahoo, D. R. and Chao, S.-H., "Performance-based plastic design method for buckling-restrained braced frames", Engineering Structures,  Vol. 32, No. 9, (2010), 2950-2958.

7.     Benavent-Climent, A., "A brace-type seismic damper based on yielding the walls of hollow structural sections", Engineering Structures,  Vol. 32, No. 4, (2010), 1113-1122.

8.     Lin, S., MacRae, G., Wu, A., Lin, P. and Tsai, K., "Development and implementation of buckling restrained braces in Taiwan", 

9.     Xie, Q., "State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in asia", Journal of Constructional Steel Research,  Vol. 61, No. 6, (2005), 727-748.

10.   "Instruction for seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings",  , No. 360, (2006).

11.   Agency, F. E. M., "Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings: Fema-356. 2000", Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington.

12.   "Researching center of building and habitation, design code of buildings against iran’s earthquake,2800 code, 1st ed", (1987).

13.   "Sap software, v 14.2, computers and structures, inc, (csi). Berkeley",  (2000).

14.   "Perform-3d software, “ nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3d structures, v.4.0.3, computers and structures, inc., (csi). Berkeley",  (2007).

15.   "Researching center of building and habitation, design code of buildings against iran’s earthquake,2800 code, 3st ed.", (2005).

16.   "Fema, (federal emergency management agency) 450, “ nehrp recommended provision for seismic regulation for new building and other structures”, washington, d.C," (2004).

17.   "Aisc, (american institute of steel construction), “seismic provision for structural steel  building  ”.Ansi/aisc 341-05",  (2005).

18.   Tsai, K.-C., Chen, H.-W., Hong, C.-P. and Su, Y.-F., "Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction", Earthquake Spectra,  Vol. 9, No. 3, (1993), 505-528.

19.   Mirzagoltabar, R., A., and Shamstabar, k., R., " Nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3d structures using perform-3d software", 1st Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran,  (2012).

20.   pakniat, S. and pakniat, E., "Required analysis in seismic retrofitting of structures based on 2800 and 360 code of iran", 1st, Motafakeran Pablications,  (2011).

21.   Uang, C., M., and Nakashima, M., Steel buckling-restrained braced frames. 2004: CRC Press LLC.





International Journal of Engineering
E-mail: office@ije.ir
Web Site: http://www.ije.ir